Evaluating the Validity of Systematic Reviews to Identify Empirically Supported Treatments
Product Description:
The best available evidence is one of the three basic inputs into evidencebased
practice. This paper sets out a framework for evaluating the quality
of systematic reviews that are intended to identify empirically supported
interventions as a way of summarizing the best available evidence. The
premise of this paper is that the process of reviewing research literature and
deriving practical recommendations is an assessment process similar to the
assessment process that we use to understand student performance and derive
educational recommendations. Systematic reviews assess the quality and
quantity of evidence related to a particular intervention and apply standards
to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to justify an endorsement of the
intervention as Âempirically supportedÂ. The concepts and methodological
tools of measurement validity can be applied to the systematic review process
to clarify their strengths and weaknesses.
Keyword(s):
validity, systematic reviews, evidence-based practice
Product/Publication Type(s):
Peer-reviewed publications in scholarly journals Published/In Press
Target Audience:
Professionals
Alternative Format:
Electronic (disc, CD, 508 compliant web posting)
To Obtain Copies (URL or Email):
COVID-19 Related Data:
N/A