RIPM Technical Report #10: Comparison of Different Scoring Procedures for the CBM Maze Selection Measure

2012

The purpose of this study was to extend the previous research on scoring procedures by comparing the reliability and validity of different CBM maze selection scoring procedures across students at elementary-, middle-, and high-school levels. Two different scoring procedures were examined in this study. The first scoring procedure compared discontinuing scoring after 2 consecutive errors with discontinuing scoring after 3 consecutive errors. The second scoring procedure compared using the score of correct maze selections with the score of correct minus incorrect maze selections. In this study, reliability is examined by looking at alternate-form reliability coefficients and validity is examined by looking at predictive validity coefficients. The following research question is addressed: Do reliability and validity differ with type of scoring procedure?

Reports and monographs

Professionals, Students

Electronic (disc, CD, 508 compliant web posting)

http://www.progressmonitoring.net/pdf/TR10asls.pdf.

N/A